Doping: CAS imposes four-year ban on Russian curler Krushelnitsky

Published:Wednesday, December 5, 2018
Gearbest Gaming Mini PC Sales promotion
Gaming Mini PC Sales

Gearbest Global First Launch: $299.99 UMIDIGI Z2 PRO 4G Phablet - TWILIGHT promotion
Global First Launch: $299.99 UMIDIGI Z2 PRO 4G Phablet - TWILIGHT

Gearbest 2018 Vacuum Cleaner Series Sale: Huge Discounts! promotion
2018 Vacuum Cleaner Series Sale: Huge Discounts!

Gearbest First 2 units enjoy $164.99 for Teclast F5 Laptop 360° Rotating Touch Screen promotion
First 2 units enjoy $164.99 for Teclast F5 Laptop 360° Rotating Touch Screen

doping-cas-imposes-four-year-ban-on-russian-curler-krushelnitsky

FILE PHOTO: Curling – Pyeongchang 2018 Winter Olympics – Mixed Doubles Bronze Medal Match - Olympic Athletes from Russia v Norway - Gangneung Curling Center - Gangneung, South Korea – February 13, 2018 - Alexander Krushelnitsky, an Olympic athlete from Russia. REUTERS/Cathal McNaughton

(Reuters) - The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) handed Russian curler Alexander Krushelnitsky a four-year ban on Tuesday following a positive dope test at the Pyeongchang Olympics in February.

The Russian and his wife Anastasia Bryzgalova were stripped of their mixed doubles bronze at the time of the Games in South Korea after an in-competition test for the banned substance Meldonium.

The Swiss-based CAS said in a statement that the sanction was the final one delivered by the anti-doping division set up for the Pyeongchang Games.

It said the four-year “period of ineligibility” would run from Feb. 12, 2018 — the day the curler had accepted a provisional suspension.

A CAS hearing in February had found Krushelnitsky guilty, with the Russian agreeing to return his medal along with his wife’s.

CAS said on Tuesday the sole arbitrator found that Krushelnitsky “could not establish the source of Meldonium in his sample and that his defence arguments were not supported by reliable or credible evidence.”

It added that because the athlete could not establish that his use of Meldonium was non-intentional, “he did not qualify for the elimination or reduction of any period of ineligibility.”

The arbitrator’s decision can be appealed.

Reporting by Alan Baldwin, editing by Toby Davis

Leave your comment